USENET for backups?

| Comments | 1 TrackBack

I've been looking at online storage solutions to do my own backups for a while. I immediately ruled out various backup providers such as Mozy because I fundamentally don't trust anyone to do my backups for me. Every backup provider I've looked at has had some horror story and I have no intention of being the 1 in 100,000 customer whose backups were lost when s/he most needed them.

14.4k modem
shattered hard disk thanks to Anigwei

I started off with a simple backup strategy - create a 80GB TrueCrypt drive, and using Cygwin and rsync I'd mirror my important data to this drive once a week. The problem then was finding an offsite location to store this sucker.

I used DreamHost's almost unlimited storage for some time before they informed me that storing backups on their service was not allowed. They're not the only ones of course - I looked at HostGator, Bluehost and a bunch of other budget hosts who offer ridiculous amounts of disk space only to find that all of them disallow storage of backups. I find this really lame and scam-like - basically they say "you have all this diskspace but don't you dare try to use it". If I were less scrupulous I might just take my 80GB file, chunk them into 128kB JPGs and say good luck to them in proving that they aren't legitimate web content.

Anyway I went searching for alternative webhosts and settled on a Budget VPS Hosting. I've got a VPS running CentOS with 100Mhz of CPU, 100MB of RAM, and 80GB of disk for $12/month. The CPU & RAM may seem slow/small by today's standards but I recall that just 13-14 years ago I would have been running Linux on a 386DX40, and then on a Pentium 90 which was more than capable of running XWindows. So really, 100Mhz of CPU on some quad core host is more than adequate for a bit of rsync.

As I'm a tightarse I continued thinking of cheaper solutions. One idea that sprang to mind was to use USENET. The larger USENET premium providers today have retention rates of 100-200 days. I wonder if its feasible to post my encrypted backup files to USENET every 30 days, and rely on their 100-200 day retention as an offsite backup mechanism. The gating factor here is upstream bandwidth - I only have 1Mbps upload from home so it would take me roughly 10 days to upload 80GB. This may not save any money since the typical USENET provider costs about $15/month but if you're on an ISP like Internode which provides free premium USENET, or already have a USENET subscription for intense discussion of Linux ISOs then the marginal cost of doing this is zero.

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://moot.mooh.org/mt-tb.cgi/60

Make regular backups of your most important data is vital. Even with a more efficient software for anti-virus and hard ceramic most powerful is still a great danger that you may lose your data file corruption, hardware failures and threats of others. O... Read More

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID


Recent Comments

  • FlippyFlink: Your idea of storing backups on the usenet is described read more
  • niro: Few other such providers to consider are sugarsync & diino read more
  • goosmurf: Hey that's nifty. The pricing is about on par with read more
  • Jamie H: Have you heard about Wuala? Free storage, and it works read more

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by goosmurf published on August 26, 2008 1:41 PM.

So when are the games ending? was the previous entry in this blog.

An eventful snow trip is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.